SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 863

G.C.MITTAL, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
K. GANESH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.BHARDWAJ, NITIN KUMAR, R.RAJESH MAHAJAN

Mukundakam Sharma, J.

( 1 ) AS the facts giving rise to the present two writ petitions are similar and the issues arising for our consideration are identical, we propose to dispose of both these writ petitions by this common judgment and order. W. P. (C) 1792/2002:

( 2 ) THE petitioner herein was posted and working in the accounts section of the respondents/cisf at North-Zone headquarters, New Delhi. The scope of his duties included, inter alia, preparing bills, making payments mainly of CEA, Tuition Fee, TA, DA and LTC claims. During the course of discharging his duties the petitioner was found to have claimed a sum of Rs. 36, 775/- in excess and illegally from the Government fund through various bills for which he was not entitled to claim. Another sum of Rs. 500/- was adjusted by him against one Inspector M. D. Manjihi. On the aforesaid account a criminal case was registered on 1. 2. 99 for the offences of cheating, fraud, forgery and misappropriation, falsification of account, intentional wrongful gain to himself and wrongful loss to the government. A first information report being FIR no. 68/99 was registered in the police station Malviya nagar under Section 120b/420/467/478/47

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top