SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 921

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Soni, R.K.MEHTA

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS who are brothers were named as offenders by the injured/complainant in FIR No. 578/2000 under Section 307/34 IPC P. S. Uttam Nagar. They were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case no. 66/01. Vide judgment dated 5. 8. 2002, they were convicted of the offence charged of. Vide order dated 8. 8. 2002, sentence imposed was 7 years RI with fine of rs. 5,000/- each, in default SI for 3 months.

( 2 ) INJURED Prashant had made the following statement pursuant whereto, FIR was registered :

"i reside at K-1/55, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, New delhi along with my family. Today dated 29. 6. 2000 at about 9. 30 PM, carrying Rs. 2/- in coins I went to purchase ice at Peeple Wala Chowk. One rupee coin fell down from my hand. Handing over the other coin to manoj, who was selling ice, I told him to give me ice for Rs. 2/ -. I told him that I would give him Re. 1/- later on. Manoj refused to sell ice to me. I told him that he knew me and I would give him Re. 1/- tomorrow. Altercation ensued. His elder brother Raju reached in the meanwhile. He slapped me on my face. Both brothers assaulted me. Raju exhaulted, today is the right time to teach me a
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top