SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 888

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, G.C.MITTAL
SUDERSHANA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jagat Rana, SURESH KAIT

Mukundakam Sharma, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for quashing of the office order dated 5. 11. 2002 passed by the respondents. The husband of the petitioner was employed with the respondents and he died on 7. 7. 1987. The petitioner was appointed as an Aya by the respondents under order dated 29. 8. 1987 in a pay scale of Rs. 400-10-550. It is, therefore, indicated from the said order that the petitioner was appointed with a regular pay scale. She was also given an accommodation by the respondents in which she is living with her two daughters, who are now of marriageable age. Some time in the month of November, 2002, a letter was received by the petitioner issued by the respondents, which is dated 5. 11. 2002, which was issued by the Deputy Commandant from the office of the Commandant, 25 BN bsf, Chhawla Camp, New Delhi removing the petitioner from service.

( 2 ) IT is clear and apparent from the aforesaid action of the respondents that the respondents have removed the petitioner after she has rendered 15 years of service. There is no allegation on behalf of the respondents that she is in any manner found to be unsuitable for the job or that she has in m








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top