SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 873

R.S.SODHI
NEENA SONI – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH SONI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.Chawla, SUNIL VERMA

R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated 31. 07. 2003 of the Additional District judge, Delhi in Misc. Case No. 19/2001/94 whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the application of the respondent herein under order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case as noted by the additional District Judge are as follows: -

". . . . . . . APPLICANT alongwith her daughter was residing at her parental home since 2/11/92. The applicant was residing separately from the petitioner when. applicant made complaint to women cell. It is stated in the application that petitioner/non-applicant had sent an undated letter by regd post A. D. as well as under UPC in which he had exposed his malafide intentions and the applicant replied the said letter, vide reply dated 16/3/93. Thereafter applicant received a notice from the counsel of petitioner and the applicant also replied the same. That on 9/10/ 94, in the morning father of applicant went to house of petitioner for making a request for reconciliation but there the father of non-applicant/petitioner refused to talk to father of applicant and passed remarks that they now have no relations with respondent which made her fa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top