B.C.PATEL, BADAR DURREZ AHMED
AMARJIT SINGH KALRA – Appellant
Versus
PRAMOD GUPTA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS matter is concerned with rights of audience of an advocate in the Court. Such a right being in general is governed in this country by practice as well as by statute. Each High Court is entitled to make rules of its own. It is known that rules are required to be made in the interest of public. It is a matter concerning the dignity and the orderly functioning of the Court. The right of the advocate to practice envelopes a lot of acts to be performed by him in discharge of his professional duties. It is not necessary that the advocate is acting in that capacity in the Court alone. He may advise his client. He may give a written opinion pertaining to a matter or he may draft plaints, written statements or petitions. But all these things are connected with the highly qualified professionals. However, these are the acts to be performed by an advocate outside the Court. But, so far as his practice in the Court is concerned, the court has the supervisory power. Hence, the court cannot be divested with the control or supervision of the Court merely because it may involve the right of an advocate.
( 2 ) LEARNED counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.