SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 803

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI-V, NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RITESH INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY JHA, Ajay Vohra, Prem Lata Bansal, Shammi Kapoor, VINAY VAISH

B. C. PATEL, C. J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal under Section 260 A of the Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as the Act) is preferred by the Revenue raising the following question:- Whether the amount of "duty draw back" can be regarded as income derived from an industrial undertaking so as to entitle the assessee a deduction under section 80-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

( 2 ) IN this matter one need not go into the facts as it is an admitted position that the assessee who is a manufacturer, has received "duty draw back" in view of the export of garments. The question is whether the amount of "duty draw back" which the assessee has received can be considered to be "profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking" in the context of section 80-I of the Act. Sub-section (1) of Section 80-I of the Act, is relevant for our purpose and, therefore, we reproduce it below:-

"80-I (1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking or a ship or the business of a hotel or the business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other powered craft to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top