MUKUL MUDGAL, MADAN B.LOKUR
JUGAN K. MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
S. S. GULATI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS CONTEMPT PETITION FILED BY THE ORIGINAL plaintiff IS BASED ON THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE EX parte ORDER OF STATUS QUO OF THIS COURT DATED 2nd APRIL, 2002 WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY his ORDER DATED 25th AUGUST, 2003 PASSED AFTER HEARING both SIDES AND WHICH ORDER IS NOW PENDING IN APPEAL before THE DIVISION BENCH. THE SUIT WAS INTER ALIA FOR partition AND AVERRED THAT THE TWO BROTHERS OF THE plaintiff (WHO IS THE MARRIED SISTER) I. E. DEFENDANT NO. 1 SHRI SHAM SUNDER GULATI, DEFENDANT NO. 3 SHRI RAJ KUMAR gulati AND DEFENDANT NO. 4 SHRI CHINTU GULATI WHO ARE legal REPRESENTATIVES OF LATE PRAKASH GULATI, ANOTHER brother OF THE PLAINTIFF HAD SOLD THE SUIT PROPERTY AT 31, BUNGLOW ROAD, KAMLA NAGAR, DELHI TO DEFENDANT NO. 7- smt. NEELAM SABLOK IN VIOLATION OF THE PLAINTIFF s rights.
( 2 ) IT IS CLAIMED THAT THE SUIT PROPERTY HAS BEEN demolished VIOLATING THE ORDER OF STATUS QUO. THE demolition IS AVERRED TO BE WITHOUT ANY VALID SANCTION and PERMISSION. IT IS ALSO STATED THAT IF RESPONDENTS are ALLOWED TO CONTINUE REBUILDING OF SUIT PREMISES IT would RESULT IN UNDUE HARASSMENT AND IRREPARABLE INJURY to THE PLAINTIFF.
( 3 ) THE RESPOND
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.