SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 806

R.S.SODHI
ISSAR NENU MAL AJBANI AND I. N. AJBARNI – Appellant
Versus
NARAIN DASS P. GODWANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.C.Mahindroo, Pramod Ahuja

R. S. SODHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 22nd November, 2003 of the Additional rent Control tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") in RCA No. 436/2002, whereby the learned Tribunal has reversed the order of the Additional Rent Controller and has allowed the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case as has been noted by the learned Tribunal are as under :

"the brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that a petition for eviction U/s 14 (1) (a) r/w Section 6a and 26 of the Delhi Rent Control Act was preferred by the respondent against the appellant. In the said proceedings the summons were sent to the appellant at the address of the premises in question and also at the address A-6, west End Colony, New Delhi. The said summons were not served upon the appellant. Service was effected by publication in the National Herald dated 26. 5. 97. Appellant thereafter was proceeded ex-party and ultimately an eviction order dated 7. 11. 97 was passed against the appellant. Appellant preferred a petition under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC on 3. 2. 98 alleging that the appellant was never served with the summons of the case nor




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top