SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 745

C.K.MAHAJAN
VINITA SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ PANDIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PUNIT TANEJA, S.D.SALWAN

C. K. MAHAJAN, J

( 1 ). THE PRESENT APPEAL IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE judgment DATED 19th MARCH, 2001passed BY ADDITIONAL district JUDGE DISMISSING THE PETITION OF DIVORCE FILED by THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTIONS 13 (I-A) (III ).

( 2 ). THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE APPELLANT AND respondent WAS SOLEMNIZED ON 7th FEBRUARY, 1993 AS PER hindu RITES AND CEREMONIES. IT WAS AN INTER CASTE LOVE marriage. OUT OF THE SAID WEDLOCK NO CHILD WAS BORN. ACCORDING TO THE APPELLANT FROM THE FIRST DAY OF marriage, THE PETITIONER WAS TREATED WITH UTMOST CRUELTY i. E. MENTAL AS WELL AS PHYSICAL BY THE RESPONDENT AND HIS mother. PRIOR TO MARRIAGE, THE RESPONDENT WAS SUFFERING from MENTAL DISORDER AND IS A CASE OF PARANOID schizophrenia AND PSYCHOPATHIC DISORDER. HE WAS UNDER treatment OF DR. PREMA BALI WHO OPINED THAT RESPONDENT was UNABLE TO CARRY ON THE MARITAL RELATIONSHIP. HOWEVER, THE SAID FACT WAS NOT DISCLOSED TO THE appellant. AFTER MARRIAGE THE GRAVITY OF ILLNESS increased. THE MOTHER OF THE RESPONDENT USED TO INSTIGATE the RESPONDENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT BECAUSE OF WHICH HE used TO BECOME VIOLENT AND USED TO BEAT THE APPELLANT from TIME TO TIME. THE MARRIAGE COULD NOT CONSUMMATED. THE APPELLANT FILED

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top