SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 383

MUKUL MUDGAL
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HARPAL SINGH, EX. SECURITY GUARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.MAKHIJA

MUKUL MUDGAL

( 1 ) THE respondent No. 1/wokrman was appointed as a Security Guard on 12th November, 1982. It is not in dispute that in June, 1991, the respondent No. 1 met with an accident while in service and suffered disability. He was retired from service on 22nd February, 1994. The Labour Court by its impugned Order reinstating the respondent No. 1 has noticed the provisions of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act ) and referred to and applied the judgment of a Learned Single Judge of this Court in Baljeet Singh Vs DTC reported as 83 (2000) DLT 286.

( 2 ) SECTION 47 of the Act reads as under:

"47. NON-DISCRIMINATION in Government employments. _ (1) No establishment shall dispense with, or reduce in rank, an employee who acquires a disability during his service:

PROVIDED that, if an employee, after acquiring disability is not suitable for the post he was holding, could be shifted to some other post with the same pay scale and service benefits:

PROVIDED further that if it is not possible to adjust the employee against any post, he may be kept on a supernumerary pos

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top