SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 406

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
KAKAS RESTAURANT – Appellant
Versus
K. L. SEHGAL – Respondent


Mukundakam Sharma

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Delhi on 18. 5. 1983 under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. By the aforesaid order the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner had held that both the units,namely, Kaka Da Hotel and Kaka Restaurant constitute one establishment. In the present petition the petitioner has prayed for setting aside and quashing the aforesaid impugned order.

( 2 ) THE Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in the aforesaid impugned order has recorded various contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner as also on behalf of the Department. After appreciating the evidence on record, it was held by him that the nature of business of both the Kaka Da Hotel and Kaka Restaurant is common and both belong to one family and that the business of Kaka Restaurant was, in fact, expansion of business of Kaka Da Hotel. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner also referred to the various tests laid down by the Supreme Court to determine as to what would constitute one establishment in the case of Associated Cement Co. Ltd. vs. Its











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top