SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 705

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
JUGLAL – Appellant
Versus
DY. COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Andley, GITA MALHOTRA, RAMESH CHANDRA

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE genesis of this dispute is to be found in the Report of the Halqua Patwari dated 9. 7. 1998 in which it has been stated that on the demarcation of Khasra No. 503/2, which is Gaon Sabha land, unauthorised construction carried out by the Petitioner, namely, Shri Juglal was noticed. The Report also mentions that the Patwari had been informed that this construction was 25-30 years old. On the basis of this Report proceedings under Section 86-A for the ejectment of the Petitioner appear to have been initiated. In the course of these proceedings, by his Order dated 31. 3. 2001, the Revenue Assistant (Vasant Vihar Sub-Division), New Delhi-110 037 ordered the ejectment of the Petitioner from Khasra No. 503/2 (1-10), Village Rajokri, New Delhi with immediate effect.

( 2 ) IT appears that no evidence was recorded. Yet, in the view of the Revenue Assistant, the illegal encroachments/houses were on Khasra No. 509/2. It also transpires that some proceedings had been taken against the father of the Petitioner in respect of Khasra No. 509/2 which were dismissed in default.

( 3 ) THE Petitioner had assailed the Order dated 15th October, 2001, of the Revenue Assistant b










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top