VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ). THE Petitioner-Workman has complained that the Orders passed in CW No. 5700/2000, dated January 24, 2002 have not been fully complied with till date. The operative part of the Order reads thus :-

". . . . . . . . THE Writ Petition is thus allowed and the order of termination dated 10. 7. 98 is hereby quashed. Respondents are directed to take the petitioner back into service and pay the salary from the date when respondent stopped paying full salary after termination of his service. The petitioner would be treated as in continuous employment without any break in service. In case the petitioner is not fit to perform duty which he as performing since the initial appointment till his disability, the respondent shall deal with the case of the petitioner in terms of proviso to Section 47 of the said Act. Petitioner shall also be entitled to costs of rs. 3000/ -. Sd/- sanjay Kishan Kaul judge"

( 2 ) THIS Order was carried in Appeal firstly before the Division Bench and thereafter to the Hon ble Supreme Court, but without any success. At no point of time was the operation of the Order stayed by either of the Appellate Courts. Clearly, therefore, the Delhi Transport

Click Here to Read the rest of this document