SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1177

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SUKESH MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Chawla, RAJESH RAVAL

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is a proprietor of Mahajan and Co. a sole proprietorship concern is involved in the export of garments. The petitioner obtained a revalidated quota for export of garments for the year 1994. The question involved in the present petition relates to the forfeiture of the amount of Rs. 74,111. 00 on account of the non-fulfilment of its export obligation under the policy. The original forfeiture amount was Rs. 1,26,556. 00.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claimed that on 23. 12. 1994 a theft took place in his factory premises as a result of which the entire quota could not be shipped before the due date, i. e. 31. 12. 1994. The petitioner was aggrieved by the Speaking Order passed by the AEPC whereby the forfeiture was made. He filed an appeal before the Textile Commissioner before which he sought the invocation of the force majeure condition as spelt out under paragraph 15 of the Notification dated 4. 9. 1993 under the Garment Export Entitlement Policy. The petitioner sought the invocation of the force majeure condition on two grounds, i. e. , because of theft in the factory and some labour problems. However, the first appellate order records that no







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top