SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1220

O.P.DWIVEDI
RAKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARVIND SINGH, K.B.Andley, M.L.Yadav, Punit Mittal, R.N.MITTAL, S.K.KAPOOR

( 1 ) THESE appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 14. 1. 2002 whereby appellant Rakesh Kumar was found guilty of offence u/s 420/ 468/ 471/ 363/ 366/506/384/120b IPC and the remaining two accused Chander Shekhar and Sri Chand were held guilty u/s 420/468/471/120b IPC and the order on sentence dated 16. 2. 2002 whereby appellant Rakesh was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years u/s 366 IPC and fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default RI for two years. He was further sentenced to undergo RI for a period of three years each for offences u/s 420/468/471/363/384 IPC and fine of Rs. 3,000/- each. Convict Rakesh was also sentenced to undergo RI for six months each for offences under sections 120b and 506 IPC. Remaining two appellants Sri Chand and Chander Sekhar were sentenced to undergo RI for three years for each of offences u/s 420/468/471 IPC and to pay a fine in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- each for these offences in default RI for one year each. Convicts are also sentenced to undergo RI for six months u/s 120b IPC.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY narrated facts leading to these appeals are that on 15. 7. 92 Smt. Omvati, the mother of prosecutrix Poonam filed a typed application dated 9. 7.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top