SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1202

A.K.SIKRI, B.C.PATEL
INDRA PERFUMERY CO. THR. SUDERSHAB OBEROI – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunjakant Singla

( 1 ) THIS matter has been placed before the Division Bench in view of the order dated 6. 3. 2003 made by the learned Single Judge as the learned Single Judge has differed with the view of another Single Bench of this Court in the case of Municipal corporation of Delhi v. Ram Kishan, 2001 0 LLR 405.

( 2 ) THE issue involved is as to from which date workman would be entitled to receive wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred as the Act) namely, whether from the date of award or from the date, writ petition is filed in this Court. Section 17-B of the Act reads as under:

"payment of full wages to workman pending proceedings in higher Courts Where in any case, a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal by its award directs reinstatement of any workman and the employer prefers any proceedings against such award in a High Court or the Supreme Court, the employer shall be liable to pay such workman, during the period of pendency of such proceedings in the High Court or the Supreme Court, full wages last drawn by him, inclusive of any maintenance allowance admissible to him under any rule if the workman had not been employed in any establishment duri















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top