SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1178

MANMOHAN SARIN
DURA-LINE INDIA PVT, LTD – Appellant
Versus
BPL BROADBAND NETWORK PVT. LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANURADHA MUKHERJI, SANJAY JAIN, Sanjiv Narula

( 1 ) BY IA No. 2294/2002, under order XXXVII, Rule 3 (5] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure defendant seeks unconditional leave to contest the suit. Plaintiff M/s. Dura-Line India Pvt. Ltd. , formerly known as M/s. Bharti Dura-Line limited, has instituted the present suit under Order XXXVII. CPC, claiming a sum of rs. 35,88,620 (Rs. Thirty five lacs eighty eight thousand six hundred twenty only) together with costs. Plaintiff also seeks pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 24 per cent per annum. Upon summons being issued under Order XXXVII CPC, defendant entered appearance accompanied with an application for condonation of delay In entering appearance. Vide order dated 14-2-2002, delay in entering appearance was condoned, Plaintiff took out summons for judgment in response to which the defendant has filed the above application, seeking leave to contest.

( 2 ) BEFORE considering the grounds urged in support of the application for unconditional leave to contest the suit, the facts in brief as they emerge from the plaint, application and admitted documents may be noted.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFFS case in brief is that it is engaged, inter alia, in the business of























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top