SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1228

O.P.DWIVEDI
SULTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
amicus curiae, S.K.KAPOOR, Sumit Verma

O. P. Dwivedi, J

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 26. 3. 2001 and order of sentence dated 29. 3. 2001 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 21 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo ri for 10 years fine of Rs. 1 lakh in default RI for one year.

( 2 ) THE case of prosecution is that on 26. 5. 99 at about 1. 05 p. m. when appellant was apprehended and searched on the basis of secret information he was found in possession of 5 gram of smack. Appropriate charges under Sec. 21 of the NDPS Act were-framed against the accused to which he pleaded not guilty. After considering the evidence led by the prosecution and other material on record, learned Additional Sessions Judge held the charges against the appellant proved and accordingly convicted and sentenced him as stated earlier.

( 3 ) IN appeal learned counsel for the appellant Mr. Sumeet Verma, advocate, has not challenged the conviction of the appellant. He has pleaded for leniency in the matter of sentence in view of amended provisions of section 21 of NDPS Act. This amendment which came into force on 2nd october, 2001, reads as under:-

21. Punishment for contravention in relation to m






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top