SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 106

S.MUKERJEE
SUDYOG LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
FLISTEX MAGNETICS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhinav Jain, B.L.Pandey, JAYANT NATH, Y.K.Jain

S. Mukerjee

( 1 ) THIS application (IA No. 468/2001) has been filed by the plaintiff with the prayer for striking out the defendce of the defendant, on the ground of non-production of ledger and accounts by defendant in violation of the undertaking given to this Court in the order dated 19. 9. 2001.

( 2 ) THE main suit filed by the plaintiff is for recovery of Rs. 55 lakhs on account of the alleged non-payment by the defendant company of the charges falling due on account of (i) "liquid Nitrogen" actually supplied by the plaintiff; (ii) fixed facility charges payable by the defendant; and (iii) the compensation in lieu of short lifting/non-lifting of material in terms of agreement dated 16. 3. 1992 as executed between the parties.

( 3 ) DURING the course of arguments, it has been admitted that the only surviving dispute between the parties, is primarily regarding the liability of the defendant on account of the short-lifting/non-lifting of minimum quantity of liquid nitrogen in terms of the agreement dated 16. 3. 1992.

( 4 ) IN fact, as recorded in the order dated 21. 9. 1995 of this Court after hearing the parties, the defendant has been already directed to pay certain admitted amo





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top