SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 216

S.MUKERJEE
NANDAN PRASAD GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.N.AGRAWAL, RAVI GUPTA

S. MUKERJEE

( 1 ). THE plaintiff has filed the suit under Order 37 CPC on the basis of the sale agreement agreement executed by the defendant in his favour for the sale of the first floor of the property bearing No. D-68, East of Kailash, New Delhi for a total sale consideration amounting to Rs. 25 lakhs.

( 2 ). IT is stated that the plaintiff has paid Rs. 6 lakhs through cheque No. 481325 dated 30. 10. 99 drawn on Bank of India, Haus Khas, New Delhi. The possession of the property was to be handed over after completion of construction on or before 30. 6. 2000 and simultaneously the sale of documents were to be executed and registered besides the balance consideration of Rs. 19 lakhs was to be paid at the time of registration of the documents. It is further stated that the defendant from time to time approached the plaintiff and expressed need for money on the ground that construction is going on and he is short of money. The plaintiff believed his representation and entrusted a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs in three installments of Rs. 2 lakhs each on 23. 12. 99, 19. 4. 2000, 14. 6. 2000. All the payments were made through cheques. As per the plaintiff he has made a total payment of Rs. 12 la











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top