SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 167

B.N.CHATURVEDI, VUENDER JAIN, VIJENDER JAIN
GOPINATH ROUT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Saroj Bidawat, VINOD SRIVASTAVA

Vijender Jain

( 1 ) PETITIONER has filed the writ petition, inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the ACR for the year 1995 and Initiating Officer grading portion of the ACR for the year 1996 as well as quashing the direction of the Chief of Army Staff dated 3. 11. 2000 rejecting the statutory complaint dated 13. 7. 1999 of the petitioner and to consider the petitioner as per rules for grant of promotion to the rank of Subedar Major by a special DPC maintaining his original seniority with all consequential benefits.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. On 3rd February, 2003, this Court passed the following order :

"counsel for the petitioner has contended that the ACR of the petitioner has been fuzzed after the grading by the Initiating Officer. We have perused the original ACR for the period of 1994-95. Originally it seems following grading was given :-

INITIATING Reviewing Officer Officer

A) Professional Competence (The practical knowledge and ability to apply the same to various situations to find practical solutions to problems ).

B) Integrity (Honesty trust worthiness and maintenance of high sense of values)

C) Self Discipline and Perso


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top