SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 174

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SATISH KUMAR NAYAR – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 ) THE petitioner registered under the NPRS, 1979 scheme for an MIG flat giving her address as A-2/4 Model Town, Delhi. The petitioner addressed a letter dated 21st July 1986 requesting for a change of address to B-163, gujranwala Town, Delhi. The said letter was sent by Regd. AD post and the Regd. AD receipt as well as acknowledgment card have been filed on record and originals have been produced before the court. A further change of address was requested in the letter dated 23rd April 1990 from the said address to B- 125, Derawala Nagar, Delhi. This letter is stated to have been given in a public hearing but there is no acknowledgment of the said letter on the office copy.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims that he came to know only in the year 2001 that a flat had been allotted in 1994 to the petitioner bearing flat No. 184, III Floor, Pocket 2, Sector 23, rohini but the allotment letter was sent at the model Town addressed and the said allotment letter was returned. This allotment was cancelled due to non-payment of the amount as per the allotment letter.

( 3 ) THE petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking allotment of an alternative flat on the same






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top