( 1 ) THE challenge in these writ petitions is against action of the respondent authorities who are threatening to impound the autorickshaws/three-wheelers of the petitioners unless they are fitted with CNG kit. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioners submits that such threatening is given purportedly relying upon the orders passed by Hon ble Supreme Court. His submission is that vide order dated 18th September, 2001 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029/85 entitled M. C. Mehta v. Union of India and Ors. , the Hon ble Supreme Court has clarified that it never directed compulsory conversion of autos or taxis to CNG single fuel mode. He urges that in view of the aforesaid clarification and in the absence of any direction by supreme Court, the respondents cannot seize the autos on account of not having been converted to CNG single fuel mode.

( 2 ) IN the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents, respondents have tried to explain various orders passed by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid matter from time-to-time and on that basis it is contended that the direction of the Supreme Court is that all TSRs are to run on clean fuel. It is further explained that the clean fuels w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document