SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 877

MADAN B.LOKUR
JAIPAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
P. O. , LABOUR COURT NO. VIII – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mitul Rao, SANJOY GHOSH

( 1 ). The petitioners have challenged the Award dated 10th May, 1999 passed by the learned Labour Court in I. D. No. 171/1988.

( 2 ) THE challenge is to the denial of 100% back wages. The learned Labour Court has granted 50% of the back wages by merely stating that "ends of justice" will be served if the petitioners are granted 50% of the back wages.

( 3 ) FROM the impugned Award, there is nothing to indicate how the "ends of justice" will be served if full back wages are not given and only a part of the back wages is given. The petitioners worked for as long as four years with the respondent and their termination was held to be unjustified.

( 4 ) IN view of the fact that there is no discussion on this aspect and no reason has been given by the learned Labour Court, there is no option but to allow the writ petition and direct that the petitioners be paid full back wages from the date of the demand notice, that is, 10th February,1988 till the date of reinstatement. Fifty percent of the back wages have already been received. The respondents are liable to pay balance of the back wages.

( 5 ) THE writ petition stands disposed of. Writ Petition disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top