SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 4

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
AISHA JALAL – Appellant
Versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NILIMA TRIPATHI, SARAT CHANDRA

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 ) THE petitioner claimed to be occupier/owner of property No. T-235, Id Gah Road, Qadam Sharif Estate, Delhi since 11. 3. 1986 on transfer of interest by Shri Jagat Ram in her favour. It is stated that Shri Jagat Ram was a displaced person from West Pakistan who occupied the property in question measuring 166 square yards and constructed a double storey building which was subsequently transferred to the petitioner.

( 2 ) IT may be noticed that no documents of title have been filed and the claim is based on the basis of payment of damages. In fact learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that there is no title to the property in question but that Shri Jagat Ram was paying damages earlier and thereafter the petitioner has been paying damages, some of the receipts of which have been filed on record. It is further stated that the property stand mutated in the name of the petitioner by the MCD though the same is for the purpose of house tax.

( 3 ) THE genus of the dispute started from the receipt of a show cause notice by the petitioner from respondent No. 3 vide letter dated 31. 7. 1987 calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 29,882/- towards da

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top