SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 578

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
DHIRAJ KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
PALMEX ENTERPRISES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SAHAY, Ankul Chowdhary Pradhan, MANINDER SINGH

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THE facts of the case are that the petitioner s first four attempts to clear Phase-I of the MBBS Examination have remained futile. The undisputed case is that he had sought to clear the Phase-I Examination in the fifth opportunity and for this purpose had got the clearance of the University, namely, utkal University, Bhubaneswar. This is evident from the letter dated 04. 01. 2002 authored by the Controller of Examination of that University. This attempt has proved to be somewhat favourable. Although he succeeded in passing the examination, the declared result has been recalled by the University, and it is this action that has been assailed in these proceedings.

( 2 ) THE relevant provision is Regulation 7 (3) which stipulates thus

"7 (3) The first2 semesters (approximately 240 teaching days) shall be occupied in the Phase I (pre-clinical) subjects and introduction to a broader understanding of the perspectives of medical education leading to delivery of health care. No student shall be permitted to join the Phase II (para-clinical/clinical) group of subjects until he has passed in all the Phase I (pre-clinical) subjects for which he will be permitted not mor








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top