SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 623

C.K.MAHAJAN
CASTROL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
A. K. MEHTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANMOHAN SINGH

C. K. Mahajan, J.

( 1 ) BY way of the present suit, the plaintiff seeks permanent injunction and damages against the defendants. The plaintiff has also sought a decree for delivery up of all the infringing containers, blocks, dies, wrappers, packing material etc.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that plaintiffs are engaged in processing of and trading in industrial lubricants, greases, brake fluids, wood preservatives, metal cleaning compounds, anti-freezing compounds, hydraulic fluids and like products in India. The plaintiff No. 1 is the registered proprietor of trademark "castrol" in respect of oils for heating, lighting and lubricating. The wora Castrol appears in an oblique script across the horizontal member of the white portion. The turnover of the plaintiffs runs into crores. The plaintiffs have also spent a large amount of money on advertising and publicity of Castrol products. The plaintiffs are also selling its products under the mark "castrol AP-3" in which the plaintiffs also enjoy copyright.

( 3 ) IT is stated that the defendants have adopted and used a similar trade mark bestrol in respect of Special AP-3 Greases which is similar to Castrol Ball Bearing Greases AP-3 in re








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top