S.K.AGARWAL
RAJ KUMAR RAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged eye-witness of the occurrence PW 2 (Amit Kumar), of the case has already been examined. No role is assigned to the petitioner. Statement of PW 2 has been filed. It is argued that there is no evidence. Learned Counsel for the State is unable to contest the same.
( 3 ) IN view of above, petitioner is ordered tobe released onbail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
( 4 ) TRIAL Court record be sent back. Petition stands disposed of. Dasti. Petition disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.