( 1 ) BY way of the present petition, petitioner seeks directions against respondent No. 2 to register an FIR on his complaint against respondent No. 4. Though, during the pendency of the present proceedings, parties have entered into a compromise, but keeping in view the fact that such petitions are recurringly being filed we are of the opinion that some directions are required to be given in the matter as we are of the opinion that the conduct of some of the finance companies is predatory.

( 2 ) BEFORE we deal with the directions which we propose to give in the matter for future guidance we may record the settlement arrived at between the parties for the purposes of the present petition.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 4 had financed the purchase of two cars by the petitioner. The two cars are Ford Ikon bearing No. DL-3cs-8568 and the other is honda City bearing No. DL-3c S 9191, There are two defaults in repayment of the monthly instalments for finance in respect of both the cars. Respondent no. 4 in purported exercise of its power to repossess the vehicle i. e. Honda city, repossess the same on 29. 4. 2003. Petitioner claimed that the repossession was in fact a case of cars