SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 496

B.N.CHATURVEDI
VIJAY KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shobha Aggarwal, V.K.Malik

B. N. CHATURVEDI

( 1 ) CHARGESHEETED for offences punishable under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/506/120-B IPC, the petitioner, Vijay Khanna, by moving instant petition, seeks his release on bail.

( 2 ) IN response to an advertisement emanating from the petitioner-accused, one Tarsem Goyal came in contact with the petitioner-accused who claimed himself to be the proprietor of M/s. Viva Vision , E-224, Sanik Farm, New Delhi. Misrepresenting himself as an agent of a USA based buyer and also as consultant and agent of certain London based companies, the petitioner-accused promised to secure orders for export of carpet, durries, bed covers, worth Rs. 1. 2 crores to USA based buyer in connivance with his co-accused Kirpal Singh, General Manager of M/s. International Trade Factors Limited (ITFL), New Delhi. He got letters of credit opened with an intent to make said Tarsem Goyal (complainant) believe that he was there to help him in supply of his goods and in securing his payments. He is alleged to have cheated the complainant of Rs. 31 lakhs on the pretext of arranging letters of credit for export of aforesaid goods. He approved the samples and entered into three memoranda of understandin










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top