VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
VIJENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. THE petitioner was appointed as conducted in the year 1984. On 14. 2. 1993, petitioner met with an accident causing loss of his right hand and was unable to perform the duties of a conductor. Petitioner was retired prematurely on medical grounds. It is the case of the petitioner that the retirement of the petitioner was in contravention of the circular dated 15. 10. 73 and 20. 1. 92 i. e. , without being asked for option for redesignation on a subordinate or alternative post.
( 2 ) MR. D. N. Vohra counsel for the petitioner has stated that in view of the judgment of Baljeet Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation DLT 286 and other decision passed by this Court as well as Supreme Court , the respondent is under an obligation to provide alternative suitable job to the persons who have incurred disability during the course of employment.
( 3 ) MR. Vibhu Shankar counsel for the respondent has invited attention of the Court to the judgment of Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Sadh Ram LPA 650/2002 decided on 19th September,2002 by Division Bench of this Court. Mr. Vohra has contended that the said judgment can be distinguished. Division Bench in Sadh Ram s case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.