SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 505

S.K.MAHAJAN
JUMAX FOAM PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANINDER SINGH, NEMO K.PARASARAN

S. K. MAHAJAN

( 1 ) PETITIONER is engaged in manufacturing of Flexible Polyurethane Foam and articles thereof, falling under certain headings of the Central Excise Tariff, at its factory in Ghaziabad. In the manufacturing of polyurethane foam and in the process of conversion of foam into different articles, such as sheets etc. , some waste and scrap of foam is generated incidently. The said waste/ scrap is classified in a different heading of the Central Excise Tariff. For the period 1/04/1990 to 31/03/1993. The respondent recovered excise duty from the petitioner on the basis of the notifications issued from time to time under the provisions of the Central Excise and Salt Act (in short referred to as "the Act" ). According to the petitioner, it was not liable to the payment of the excise duty recovered by the respondents and an application/ claim was, therefore, filed before the excise authorities for refund of the excise duty alleged to have been paid in excess by the petitioner. This claim/ application of the petitioner was rejected by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise by order dated 30. 12. 1993 on the ground that the claim was hit by limitation and also that the same wo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top