SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 501

J.D.KAPOOR
DELUXE ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Sahni, DIPAK KHADARIA, RITESH KUMAR, Sangita CHANDRA

J. D. KAPOOR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of sum of Rs. 15,70,081. 50 with pendentelite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum on account of earnest money amounting to Rs. 10,51,250/- forfeited by the defendant and interest on the deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs retained by the defendant illegally from 15. 3. 82 to November 1982.

( 2 ) IN brief the facts of the case are that the defendant DDA published an advertisement in the newspaper notifying that the auction would be conducted on 22. 12. 81 with respect to various plots namely 6 and 7, 4 and 5 etc. in local shopping Centre, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. With respects to plots No. 4 and 5, the area was s pecified as 135 sq. meter and total floor area was mentioned as 787. 50 sq. meters with number of storeys mentioned as six plus basement .

( 3 ) THE plaintiff company submitted bid forms and gave bid of Rs. 42,05,000/ -. The said bid was accepted by the defendant DDA. The plaintiff company deposited the earnest money of Rs. 10,51,250/ -. Clause 2 (vi) of the terms and conditions of auction required the plaintiff to deposit the balance amount within 15 days of the acceptance of the bid and lette



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top