SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 470

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, USHA MEHRA
SURINDER KUMAR BINDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KRISHAN KUMAR GOGNA, MUKTA GUPTA, Rashmi Chopra

( 1 ) MR. Krishan Kumar, Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner has already deposited that bill amount in the office of the respondent No. 2 and endorsement of the same is given on the receipt itself. Since the full amount has been paid, the respondents are also not interested in pursuing the criminal litigation. In this view of the matter, the FIR lodged against the petitioner bearing No. 110/99 under Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act r/w Section 379, IPC at Police Station Samay Pur Badli is ordered to be quashed. Any proceedings initiated thereon pursuant to the FIR No. 110/99 under Section 39/44 Electricity Act and 379, IPC of P. S. Samay Pur Badli in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate are ordered to be dropped. Order accordingly. The petition stands disposed of. Dasti.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top