( 1 ) REGULAR Second Appeal 208 of 2003 is directed against the judgment and order dt. 6. 11. 2003 of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, in R. C. A. No. 20 of 2003 upholding the order of the Civil Judge dated 26. 4. 2003 dismissing the objections of the appellant filed against the judgment and decree dated 30. 9. 1985 for possession passed in Suit No. 155/1982.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case, as noted by the learned Additional District Judge, are that :

"1. This appeal would demonstrate the limits and the extent to which the appellant has exploited, misused and abused the judicial process for retaining the possession of the suit premises even after losing up to the Hon ble Delhi High Court in 2nd appeal against decree of possession passed by the trial court then presided over by Sh. Z. S. Solanki, Sub-Judge, Delhi on 30. 9. 1985. Indeed, my judicial conscience got pricked and was shaken to note how the litigating tyres studded in the philosophy of principles of natural justice were exploited to the hilt by the appellant in continuing to remain in possession on grounds which he knew were untenable in law. 2. Now it is time to give a factual matrix of the case