SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 856

J.D.KAPOOR
VIKAS YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTER PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Mukundan, G.K.Bharti, K.N.Balgopal, V.P.SAINI

J. D. KAPOOR, J.

( 1 ) THESE are the petitions arising out of case no. 78/2002 under Section 364/302/201 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Kavi Nagar Police Station, Ghaziabad, seeking transfer of the case under Section 407 Cr. P. C. , pending before the Court of Sh. S. N. Dhingra, Addl. Sessions Judge to any other court of competent jurisdiction. It is pertinent to mention that earlier to these petitions, the petitioners had also moved a similar petition before this court which was dismissed with sombre advice by his Lordship Justice R. C. Chopra to the learned Additional Sessions Judge that judges trying criminal cases should neither be too vocal nor to be excited in making observations or comments which may have tendency to send wrong signals to the parties.

( 2 ) THIS case which was transferred from U. P. to Delhi by the orders of the Supreme Court, was assigned for trial by the District and Sessions Judge of Delhi to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sh. S. N. Dhingra.

( 3 ) THE earlier petition was a result of various incidents that took place during the proceedings which allegedly caused serious apprehension in the mind of the petitioners that they may not get a fair trial.



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top