SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 867

J.D.KAPOOR
PUNEET SINGH CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.JHA, V.K.Malik

J. D. KAPOOR, J.

( 1 ) BY this common order, both these petitions are disposed of.

( 2 ) THE apprehension of the counsel for the petitioners is that on appearance before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate pursuant to the non-bailable warrants they may not be released on bail in spite of the fact that the offence is bailable. This apprehension appears to be misplaced as in bailable offence the power of the Magistrate to procure the presence of the accused who has not been appearing despite service of summons by way of warrant of arrest with the direction to produce the accused before him is solely for the purpose of procuring his presence and the moment such a person is either produced in execution of warrant of arrest or appear on his own has to be released on furnishing bond with or without surety as liberty of no person can be curtailed, abridged or put in shelf in a case where he is entitled to be released on bail.

( 3 ) POWER to procure the presence of the accused through warrant of arrest flows from Section 89 of Cr. P. C which reads as under:-

"89. Arrest on breach of bond for appearance:- when any person who is bound by any bond under this Code to appear before a Court, does










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top