SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 850

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
RAJ RANI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sangita CHANDRA, Sonali Malhotra Sehgal, SUNIL MALHOTRA

( 2 ) WITH the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage.

( 3 ) A perpetual lease was executed dated 20. 04. 1972 in favour of the petitioners in respect of plot No. A - 74, Naraina Industrial Area Phase -I, New Delhi measuring 1941 sq. yds. for all industries allowed under the Master Plan for Delhi except acid and chemicals, cold storages, ice factories and food products. The petitioners constructed on the said plot and was issued the occupancy certificate.

( 4 ) THE petitioners received a show-cause notice dated 08. 01. 2002 alleging that there was unauthorised construction to the extent that a weigh bridge in front side of the open space of the premises had been installed and the same was in violation of the terms and conditions of the clauses of the lease deed being clauses II (2 ). II (11) and II (12 ). The said clauses are as under:-

"ii. The Lessee for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns covenants with the Lessor in the manner following that is to say: - (2) The lessee shall not deviate in any manner from the lay-out plan nor alter the size of the industrial plot whether by sub-division, amalgam






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top