Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THE Respondent University contends that the Petitioner was implicated in FIR 416 /1999 involving extortion and causing bodily injury with the use of a fire arm. It is vehemently argued that the witnesses had turned hostile and therefore the Additional Sessions Judge, in his judgment dated 10th September, 2001, had no alternative but to give the benefit of doubt to the Petitioner and his coaccused. The Petitioner had been incarcerated for approximately two years.

( 2 ) ON December 12, 2001, the following decision was taken by the Respondent:

"f. No. PO/35 /99-00 December 12,2001 office ORDER this is in reference to your representation dated September 27,2001 addressed to the Vice-Chancellor, JMI regarding revocation of Rustication Order dated october 11,1999. Your case was placed before the Discipline Committee in its meeting held on december 10, 2001 at 2. 30 p. m. The case was deliberated at length. The judgment of Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. Sessions Judge in Session Case No. 93 of 2000 was perused. It was noted by the Committee that the learned Judge has given benefit of doubt to the accused as the prosecution could not prove its case beyond a shadow of doubt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document