P.C.JAIN
ARUN KAPUR – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM KAPUR – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two appeals purportedly under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the Act) purportedly because that is the precise question which this Court is called upon to answer, have been filed by the above named appellant against the orders/directions/findings/observations dated 19. 8. 2001 and 10. 9. 2000 made by the sole arbitrator Mr. Justice a. M. Ahmadi (former chief Justice of India) in pending arbitral proceedings in relation to certain disputes which have arisen between the parties. As an objection has been raised about the very maintainability of these appeals before this Court at the very outset, the counsel for the parties have been heard at length on this question and therefore this order is confined to the question of maintainability of the appeal under the said provision of law.
( 2 ) BEFORE coming to the real controversy between the parties, it is necessary to refer to the background leading to the orders/findings of the sole arbitrator which are sought to be assailed in these appeals. Disputes having arisen between. the parties, the parties entered into a Memorandum Of Understanding (hereinafter REFERRE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.