SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 13

B.A.KHAN, V.S.AGGARWAL
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRITHVI RAJ – Respondent


V. S. AGGARWAL

( 1 ) LT. Col. Joginder Singh (Retd.) petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this court with respect to article 215 of the Constitution of India and Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. He seeks proceedings for criminal contempt of court to be initiated against the respondents.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT no. 3, Gurcharan Singh Chopra, is the deceased) is the main person against whom the assertions to be REFERRED TO to herein have been made while respondent no. 2 is the wife of respondent no. 1.

( 3 ) THE sum and substance of the assertions made by the petitioner as cajoled from the petition are that respondent no. 3 has sold the property illegally to respondent no. 1 and the decree so passed even is not valid. As against respondents 1 and 2 it had been pleaded that respondent no. 1 has given his wrong name at one place he mentions his name as Prithvi Raj and other documents he described as Prithvi Raj Choudhry he also contends that mutation that has been effected in favour of respondent no. 1 with respect to the property (portion 2/11 East Patel Nagar, New Delhi) is illegal because respondent no. 1 has used his official position. Plea has also been raised that re



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top