SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 124

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
GANPAT SINGH – Respondent


SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

( 1 ) RULE With conset of learned counsel for parties the petition is taken up for final disposal. The petitioner was employed as a conductr with respondent DTC and while performing his offical duty on 7. 3. 1987 met with an accident resuiting in fracture of bones of his right leg. The respondent workman requested for light duty. Disputes arose between the parties about the post which the respondent should occupy. In September 1992 respondent was considered by the Medical Board which declared him permanetly medically unfit. The respondents raised theindustrial dispute in 1992 and an award was passed on 23rd August in which it was held that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment in SLP 1575/1991. Ved Praksh Singh Vs. DTC, in which it was held that the workman is entitled toreinstatement to equivalent lighat post of class III employee with continuity of service.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and during the course of hearing it was put to the learned counsel for pentitioner that the respondent Would be entitled to the protection under the persons with disability (Equal opportunities, Prtection of Righat and Full Participation)


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top