SHARDA AGGARWAL
KRISHNA SAIGAL – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL KUMAR MODI – Respondent
( 1 ) DEFENDANTS have filed this application under order 14 Rule 5 Code of Civil Procedure if or framing of additional issues. The plaintiff did not file reply to this application. However arguments were addressed by counsel for the plaintiff.
( 2 ) A narration of Brief facts is necessary. The plaintiff being owner let out the ground floor of property No. S-48, Panchshila Park, New Delhi to defendants vide lease deed dated 9/02/1987 at a monthly rent of Rs. 6,000. 00. By a supplement agreement dated 26/05/1987, defendants were permitted to construct two bed rooms with attached bath and lobby on the first floor of the said building for the cost of rs. 3,00,000/- According Ao the plaintiff, said portion was treated to be under the tenancy of defendants at a monthly rent of Rs. 5,000. 00 to be adjueted against the cost of Rs. 3,00, OOO. 00 A fresh lease deed dated 26th 7/12/1992 was executed. As per the plaintiff, both ground floor and floor; were let out to the defendants at a monthly rent of Rs. 11,000. 00. The plaintiff s claim is that the tenancy came to an end by efflux of time and it was also terminated finally by a notice dated 6/10/1997. The plaintiff has filed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.