SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 179

SHARDA AGGARWAL
R. K. MARKAN – Appellant
Versus
RAJIV KUMAR MARKAN – Respondent


SHARDA AGGARWAL

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has moved the present application under Order 12 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure for passing a decree on i he basis of the admissions made in the written statement/ counter claim of the defendants.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF has filed this suit for partition in respect "or property No,b~99, Ashok Vihar, Phase-1, Delhi. which undisputably belonged to late Pushpa Markan, wife of the plaintiff and mother of defendants 1 and 2. Smt. Pushpa Markan died on 7/06/1975. She had left a will bequeathing the property to the plaintiff and defendants, her two minor sons. The plaintiff had filed a probate case on which Letters of Administration were granted on 24/03/1977. The name of the plaintiff and the defendants was also mutated in the records of delhi Development Authority. The plaintiff being one of the legal heirs of deceased Pushpa Markan, claims l/3rd share in the suit property. The house in question at present is in possession of the defendants. Defendants have filed their written statement alongwith the counter claim.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff prays that the suit be decreed in view of admissions made by defendants in para No. 5 of the written statement. The contentio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top