SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 368

R.S.SODHI
P. V. NARASIMHA RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE (CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION) – Respondent


R. S. SODHI

( 1 ) SHRI P. V. Narasimha Rao and Shri Buta Singh have filed criminal Appeal Nos. 638 of 2000 and 621 of 2000 respectively challenging the findings of the Special Judge holding them guilty of the charges framed against them while the Rashtriya Mukti morcha has filed Criminal Revision No. 33 of 2001 challenging the acquittal of Gapt. Satish Sharma, Shri V. Rajeshwar Rao, Shri h. M. Revanna, Shri Ramalinga Reddy, Shri M. Veerappa Molly, Shri d. K. Audikesavulu, Shri M. Thimme Gowda, Shri Bhajan Lal and Shri ajit Singh, charged and tried along with the appellants.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case, as noted by the trial court are :

"1. That in the general election of 10th Lok sabha in 1991, Congress (I) emerged as single largest party. It formed the government at the centre under the leadership of accused, p. V. Narasimha Rao (A-1 ). Monsoon Session of 10th lok Sabha was to commence on 26. 7. 93. A "no confidence Motion" was moved against the Govt. by shri Ajay Mukhopadhya, a C. P. I. (M) M. P. The effective strength of Lok Sabha at that moment was 528 and Congress (I) had 251 members. Thus, the government headed by accused P. V. Narasimha Rao (A-1) was short of 14 M. Ps






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top