SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 322

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
INFO EDGE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SHAILESH GUPTA – Respondent


MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA

( 1 ) THE plaintiff by filing the present suit has sought for a decree of permanent injunction restraning the defendants, their servants, agents from operating any business , selling, offering for sale advertising and/or in any manner dealing in the internet services under the trademark/domain name "naukri. COM or any other mark/domain name, which is. identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s trade mark/domain name naukri. COM and also for rendition of accounts and damages. The plaintiff has also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for an ad interim injunction restraining the defendants from operating any business and/ or selling or offering for sale or advertising and in any manner dealing in the aforesaid trade mark /domain name of the plaintiff or any other trade mark/domain name, which may be identical and/or deceptively similar with the aforesaid mark/name.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff adopted the name nakuri. COM. on 27. 3. 1997. and since then the plaintiff is carrying on its businesss under the aforesaid domain name, which according to the plaintiff has become one of the leading websites in india. Th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top