SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 496

B.N.CHATURVEDI
AMAR NATH SEHGAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


B. N. CHATURVEDI

( 1 ) ARBITRARIBILITY or otherwise of the suit subject, in the face of arbitration clause, forming part of an agreement between the parties, is a short question posed for consideration in the present context. An answer in affirmative forecloses trial to. pave way for adjudication on the matter in controversy. by an arbitrator.

( 2 ) FAOTUAL content emanating from plaintiff s pleadings takes one way back to July ,1957 when the plaintiff, responding to an offer from Central Public works Department (defendant No. 2) of ;union of india (defendant No. 1), to create a bronze mural for display at Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi set out to accomplish the challenging task. After extensive preparation and research, plaintiff s untiring and stressful concentrated hardwork, spanning over a period of five years, dedicated to the cause, eventually produced an acclaimed piece of artistic work manifesting itself in the form of a 140 feet long and 40 feet high mural, demonstrating a delicate balance between cultural and material aspects in national perspective essence of rural and modern india being its theme. The mural so created found its rightful place in Vigyan Bhawan lobby right at it


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top