SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 527

P.C.JAIN
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
DARSHAN LAL – Respondent


R. C. Jain

( 1 ). This second appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge, dated 7. 8. 1992, by which the first appeal filed by the respondent herein against the dismissal of his suit has been allowed and the matter has been remanded back to the board of the learned trial court for adjudication on merits.

( 2 ). Briefly stated the relevant facts leading to the present appeal are that the respondent herein had filed a suit against the petitioner-DDA for injunction for restraining them from issuing any demand/recovery of damages in respect of the suit premises bearing property No. 6127/2-3, Jhandewalan Road, Paharganj, New delhi, on the averments that the said property was purchased by the father of the respondent some time in the year 1959 and after that he got his name mutated in the record of Municipal Corporation and let out the same to certain Satpal, proprietor/partner of property of Azad Hind Bag Factory. The petitioner-DDA started raising certain illegal and unauthorised demands by issuing notice under Section 7 of the Public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) Act 1971 (in short act ) which action of the DDA was illegal. The sui




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top