SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 479

MANMOHAN SARIN
S. P. MINOCHA – Appellant
Versus
LILA RAM – Respondent


MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) PETITIONER, by this review application, seeks review/recall of order dated 15. 9. 1997, by which the civil revision petition No. 1041/96 and CM. 4493/96 were disposed of. Pleadings in the review application were completed and case was adjourned from time to time to enable the parties to explore the feasibility of settlement, which did not fructify. Parties filed written synopsis and were also heard on 25. 1. 2002 and order was reserved.

( 2 ) BEFORE considering the grounds on which the review of the order dated 15. 9. 1997, is sought, the factual matrix, as recorded in the impugned order, disposing of the civil revision, may be briefly noted:-

( 3 ) PETITIONER,an advocate, is the landlord, who had filed the present civil revision petition against an order dated 8. 10. 1996, by which the suit filed by the petitioner under Section 6 of the Specific relief Act for wrongful dis-possession had been dismissed by the Civil Judge. The petitioner landlord had earlier filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (l) (a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, (hereinafter referred to as DRC Act), which was disposed of on 23. 7. 1987, giving the benefit of Section 14 (2)of the drc Ac













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top