D.K.JAIN, H.R.MALHOTRA, A.K.SIKRI, MANMOHAN SARIN
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ). How long a departmental proceeding should remain stayed pending judgment in a criminal trial is the question involved in these writ petitions, which arise out of judgments and orders dated 1803. 1998 and 28. 07. 1998 passed by the Central Administrative tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, the tribunal ) in the original applications Nos. 3209 of 1992 and 2887 of 1996.
( 2 ). The fact of the matter is being noticed from CWP No. 4116 of 1998. The petitioner was a constable working with Delhi police.
( 3 ). The following charge sheet was issued against him by the additional Commissioner of Police, North-East District, Delhi :-
"it is alleged that Constable Vinod kumar, No. 931/ne posted to Distt. Lines absented himself from duty vide D. D. No. 23 dated 12. 7. 91. Meanwhile an information was received from S. S. P Ghaziabad (U. P.) that Const. Vinod Kumar, No. 931/ne has been arrested along with 4 other persons namely Rishi Pal, Dharambir, Lokendar and vinod Kumar in case FIR No. 280 Crime No. 353, dated 12. 7. 91 U/s 399/402-IPC and 25/54/59 Arms Act, P. S. Kavi Nagar while they were planning to loot a Maruti Van and a Milk Van carrying C
observed : State of Rajasthan v. B.K.Meena and Ors.
REFERRED TO : Kusheshwar Dubey v. M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors.
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. v. Kushal Bhan
Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. v. The Workmen
Nelson Motis v. Union of India and Anr.
Shakuntala B. Modav. v. Union of India and Ors.
S.S.Darshan v. State of Karnataka and Others AIR 1996 SC 671
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.